Here in the United States... Where are the States on the subject of CBDCs? (Part 1)

Which states are more or less favorable towards CBDCs?

As I have explained before, true freedom is financial freedom, which is the freedom to conduct whatever financial transactions you choose to conduct; to spend your money as you please, privately, without the approval of or interference by any other person, entity, or government; or to save as much of your money as you deem appropriate.  If you do not have this freedom, you are not free.

Central bank digital currency (CBDC) is a digital currency that is (1) fully traceable, meaning that every transaction would be recorded and monitored by the central bank; and (2) programmable, meaning that the government and/or central bank will have the power to set and ENFORCE the rules as to how, when, where, and on what items that currency can be spent. CBDCs are the antithesis of freedom.

During my speech at the Battle For Your Frontal Lobe Conference, and in my subsequent interview by Ivory Hecker, I suggested that the State Attorneys General need to and must collectively sue the Federal government to prevent the government or the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC in the United States.

So where are the States on CBDCs? Which States are more or less favorable toward converting our current monetary system into central bank digital currency?